W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > February 2018

Re: A followup/writeup on our Monday discussions (was Re: Continuing discussion on Polyfills)

From: Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 19:48:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+KS-11YRqOMJPdGtPOc=O6o1NKzdt81Xu9L9KcSJL23GxcAxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
Cc: Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
>
>  But this still requires the user agent to be web publication-aware, at
> least to the extent that it knows to inject the app code when it doesn't
> provide its own interface, no? If it's not, the user doesn't get anything
> (which maybe is life).
>


   - if the Web Publication itself doesn't point to a Web App as a
   fallback, it should still be possible to read the publication entirely from
   the first resource to the last (just like any normal website)
   - if it does provide a Web App as a fallback, this app can implement one
   or more affordances from the publication mode (offline access, easier way
   of moving between resources from the default reading order, TOC, user
   settings, pagination...)

The Web App itself wouldn't get in the way of another WP-aware user agent
that way.
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2018 18:49:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:21 UTC