W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > July 2017

RE: definition of Web Publication

From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:58:22 +0000
To: Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>, Hugh McGuire <hugh@rebus.foundation>
CC: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, "Garth Conboy" <garth@google.com>, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, "W3C Publishing Working Group" <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SN1PR0201MB1615AE13166A37FBEB4B1ECCD5BF0@SN1PR0201MB1615.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Please remember that we don’t need to be clear on how this happens yet. This is an implementation detail that we will address after FPWD.

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: Hadrien Gardeur [mailto:hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 11:32 AM
To: Hugh McGuire <hugh@rebus.foundation>
Cc: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>; Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>; Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>; Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>; Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>; W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: definition of Web Publication

Are we clear yet on how a WP will be “made available for offline reading?”

I don't think we're clear on this at all, it's a technical minefield and a very difficult question.


If we are not yet clear about that (cf convos about service workers) then does it make sense to bake this into the (minimum viable) definition of a WP?

Agree.
Received on Friday, 28 July 2017 15:58:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:14 UTC