Re: addressable identifier? from Garth Conboy on 2017-07-28 (public-publ-wg@w3.org from July 2017)

From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:30:54 -0700
To: Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>
Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>, "Cole, Timothy W" <t-cole3@illinois.edu>, Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com>, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>, W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CADExNBOHpXTcv3-NZoDSaFyPWQHWBu4ehDST=V5hiSEkY21qFA@mail.gmail.com>

+1

Best,
   Garth

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Hadrien Gardeur <
hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com> wrote:

> I agree with Matt that it's perfectly acceptable to have open questions
> for now and that we keep moving forward.
>
> I think that's an issue we want to eventually resolve (we do care how the
> manifest can be accessed), but it doesn't have to be resolved for the first
> draft.
>

Received on Friday, 28 July 2017 14:31:17 UTC