W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > July 2017

Re: what formats count as primary resources?

From: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:36:37 +0200
To: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
CC: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D5A0A628.C0237%laudrain@hachette-livre.fr>
Universality in WP, yes.

It may be that for an EPUB4 profile, an alert would be given to publishers/author about browser support.
But we face this already today with EPUB3 : somme Reading System dont support JS for instance, that are part of EPUB3 Core Media Types.


De : Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com<mailto:bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>>
Date : vendredi 28 juillet 2017  04:09
 : Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com<mailto:matt.garrish@gmail.com>>
Cc : W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-publ-wg@w3.org>>
Objet : Re: what formats count as primary resources?
Renvoyer - De : <public-publ-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-publ-wg@w3.org>>
Renvoyer - Date : vendredi 28 juillet 2017  04:09

Universality! Anything a browser can render, or anything the OWP enables, whether or not browsers can render it yet. Bill K
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 27, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com<mailto:matt.garrish@gmail.com>> wrote:

Do we need to answer this question, or is the answer anything you can get a browser to render?

For example, I can get some Chrome and Firefox to load audio and video files without embedding in HTML, so are audio and video publications legitimate?

Or put another way, is universality of support a concern for web publications, or perhaps only for epub?

Received on Friday, 28 July 2017 06:37:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:14 UTC