RE: definition of Web Publication

Thanks all for the input.

Romain, it seemed that we were getting nowhere because of a fundamental disagreement about basic definitions.

Garth and I are working on summarizing the issues. No one said that technical discussion is off the table. It seemed to us that we were not disagreeing about fundamental issues and it’s very hard to move forward before understanding what the project is.

I have yet to see anyone other than Matt propose language for the FPWD, so please get to writing your sections with concrete wording.

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: Laurent Le Meur [mailto:laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 9:50 AM
To: Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>; W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Baldur Bjarnason <baldur@rebus.foundation>; Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: definition of Web Publication

I would propose we let our beloved chairs propose a synthesis of the new thoughts expressed in this thread and an updated short definition, so that we can restart technical discussions on a common base.

Cordialement,
Laurent

Le 26 juil. 2017 à 15:43, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com<mailto:avneesh.sg@gmail.com>> a écrit :

Sure, going to some technical detail is important, it depends on the depth to which one should go while defining principles.
Having a common definition is good, but we may not spend too much time on word smith.
Personally, I would be ok to see a list of bullet points for defining WP.

With regards
Avneesh