- From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:12:03 -0700
- To: Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>
- Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Greg Albers <GAlbers@getty.edu>, "public-publ-wg@w3.org" <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADExNBP568zaKFpUMv5zT0XX4QSmjXjT=vQXSQuhEZnP2FEdvQ@mail.gmail.com>
And to a certain extent these "bounds" could also be the part of the publication that is published on the publication date, and can be expected not to change without a new publication. This lack of change after publication is key to me (or at least some way to get back to the "originally published content") -- signatures may play a role here. Best, Garth On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org> wrote: > The bounds of a WP are IMO the resources that will be packaged when a PWP > is created. Take the exemple of an html page (a primary resource of a WP) > containing a video hosted on YouTube. The video content will stay out of > the boundaries of the PWP. We can package some constituents of a WP, not > all of them. > > Laurent > > Le 25 juil. 2017 à 22:20, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> a écrit : > > I don’t understand how a user would ever know (or care) about the “bounds” > of a WP. Can you give an example? > > At its simplest, a PWP is a WP that has been packaged up into a single > physical container of content (ala EPUB). Beyond that, we still have lots > of work to do to understand how (if at all) it would differ from a WP. > > On the “states” issue, we spent a **lot** of time in the IG trying to use > that states model and when we presented it to the rest of the W3C it was > too confusing for many as it’s a very complex grid. It’s also not clear > whether we actually need all the various differences in that grid given > many things going on with the OWP itself… > > Leonard > > *From: *Greg Albers <GAlbers@getty.edu> > *Date: *Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 3:30 PM > *To: *Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > *Cc: *Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>, "public-publ-wg@w3.org" > <public-publ-wg@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: definition of Web Publication > > Thanks all. Glad to be here and I think, now that I gave the w3c > permission to archive my posts, they'll show up here normally. > > Leonard, good thoughts, thanks! On this though: > > > - “bound” vs. organized: The word bound, to me, feels more like > packaging – and so I think we should avoid it for now. But it’s a good > word for when we get to PWP > > > I would argue that a Web Publication, whether packaged or not, must have a > sense of boundedness. That those boundaries and a users implicit or > explicit understanding of them are a key to exactly what distinguishes a > web publication from a website. Particularly from a user's (reader's) > perspective, whereas yes, I think from a user agent's perspective, it is > the manifest. That makes a lot of sense to me. > > A related question I had for you all was around the distinction between a > WP and a PWP. To me packaging is a state of a WP not a separate entity from > it. And even in our charter it states the PWP as something that we might > define and spec out but that we might not depending on activities elsewhere > in the w3c. Shouldn't then our definition of a WP encompass its states more > holistically. Online v offline, packaged v not packaged, with everything v > only with essential resources, etc...? > > Thanks, > Greg > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jul 25, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > wrote: > > Greg had an excellent point about curation, so let me try to add that in > using a term that we’ve been trying out here (so feedback on that welcome > too) > > A *Web Publication* (WP) is an intentionally curated collection of one or > more Web resources organized together through a manifest and presented to > users using Open Web Platform technologies. > > There were some other things in the suggestion that I didn’t take and I’d > like to explain > > - “bound” vs. organized: The word bound, to me, feels more like > packaging – and so I think we should avoid it for now. But it’s a good > word for when we get to PWP > - “uniquely identifiable grouping”: As we have discussed, > identification of a WP is a separate issue so that doesn’t belong in the > definition > - “reading order”: Having this in the manifest definition, I saw no > need to duplicate it in the WP definition. > > > Leonard > > *From: *Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 1:34 PM > *To: *Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>, "public-publ-wg@w3.org" > <public-publ-wg@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: definition of Web Publication > *Resent-From: *<public-publ-wg@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 1:34 PM > > Laurent - good rewrites, but let me play with it a bit… > > Do we really need the middle sentence? It doesn’t say anything useful > (IMO). The first and third, however are good. We can then put it all > together as: > > A *Web Publication* (WP) is a collection of one or more Web resources > organized together through a manifest and presented to users using Open Web > Platform technologies. > > Now to apply some simplification to the Manifest definition: > > A *manifest* is structured information about a Web Publication, such as > informative metadata and the default reading order of its primary > constituents. > > I’m not thrilled with that since it’s still not clear to me if we want all > that stuff (metadata + resources + reading order + ….) in a single > “manifest” **or** we will end up with multiple ones (but even then, it > may still conceptually be a manifest). > > Thoughts? > > Leonard > > *From: *Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org> > *Date: *Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 11:38 AM > *To: *"public-publ-wg@w3.org" <public-publ-wg@w3.org> > *Cc: *W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: definition of Web Publication > *Resent-From: *<public-publ-wg@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 11:38 AM > > The current definition is facing a large set of comments. From these > comments, I tried a variant of Matt's proposal: > > A *Web Publication* (WP) is a collection of one or more Web resources > organized together through a manifest. The content of a Web Publication can > take a wide variety of forms, from formal artistic and intellectual works > to ad hoc documents and memos. Web Publications are presented to end-users > using Open Web Platform technologies. > > A *manifest* is the structured information necessary for the proper > identification and description of a Web Publication, plus the default > reading order of its primary constituents. > > Laurent > > >
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2017 21:12:28 UTC