W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > July 2017

Re: Document repositories have been set up

From: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:38:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CADxXqOyWAXzEZs5t4kaWpf1kBMQxCGM4enywZKd1dBuq2ELVyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>
Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>

> Dear members of the WG,
> The creation of the new "w3c/wpub" repo whilst the previous "w3c/publ-wg"
> stays active is a cause of concerns. Hadrien Gardeur just told me that he
> has spotted 5 active issues on the "publ-wg" repo. And I have opened an
> issue for discussion on the "wpub" repo.
> There is no real differentiation between the issues treated in the
> different repos. Therefore we need to be very clear about which repo should
> be used for discussing Web publications, and move the existing issues on
> the chosen repo.
> -> Question to the chairs: which repo is chosen?

Note that CSSWG has one repo for ~60 specifications.

I fear confusion about which repo an issue should be opened in. And perhaps
more seriously, how do we talk about issues related to the interaction
between the specs? How do we talk about differing a11y requirements for
EPUB4 vs PWP? It's so easy to put multiple labels on an issue in a single

Received on Monday, 3 July 2017 21:39:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:14 UTC