RE: [admin] merging matt's version?

Use the tracker, IMO. It will allow for more atomic discussions, if necessary, and not cause a logjam for other work.

I was going to mention this on the call, but got muted for playing with Lincoln Logs. (For the record it was a SpaceLink capsule. :)

And I'd try to reserve pull request for obvious typos and omissions (plus sections people are tasked with writing, of course). While we can debate the merits of a pull request within the request, they can lead to having to do conflict resolution by the time they're approved. I'd rather reach consensus via an issue so we can accept the request right away once the group approves, or I can handle integrating the changes myself.

Matt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leonard Rosenthol [mailto:lrosenth@adobe.com]
> Sent: August 21, 2017 3:46 PM
> To: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>; 'Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken'
> <tsiegman@wiley.com>; 'Ivan Herman' <ivan@w3.org>; 'W3C Publishing
> Working Group' <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
> Cc: 'Tim Cole' <t-cole3@illinois.edu>; 'Luc Audrain' <laudrain@hachette-
> livre.fr>; 'Laurent Le Meur' <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>
> Subject: Re: [admin] merging matt's version?
> 
> Then if we merge the PR, where do the chairs want the comments on the full
> document?  New issues?  New PRs?
> 
> On 8/21/17, 3:08 PM, "Matt Garrish" <matt.garrish@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>     +1
> 
>     I would like to merge not because I believe in the infallibility of my
>     editing skills, but because this PR is more of a general refactoring than a
>     significant change to what was there before.
> 
>     We'll continue to make improvements as we go, but I don't want to turn
> this
>     PR into a debate over specific issues we know not everyone agrees on yet.
> 
>     Matt
> 
> 
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken [mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com]
>     > Sent: August 21, 2017 3:00 PM
>     > To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>; W3C Publishing Working Group
> <public-
>     > publ-wg@w3.org>
>     > Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>; Tim Cole <t-
>     > cole3@illinois.edu>; Luc Audrain <laudrain@hachette-livre.fr>; Laurent
> Le
>     > Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>; Matt Garrish
>     > <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
>     > Subject: RE: [admin] merging matt's version?
>     >
>     > +1
>     >
>     > Tzviya Siegman
>     > Information Standards Lead
>     > Wiley
>     > 201-748-6884
>     > tsiegman@wiley.com
>     >
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
>     > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 2:51 PM
>     > To: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
>     > Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>; Tim Cole <t-
>     > cole3@illinois.edu>; Luc Audrain <laudrain@hachette-livre.fr>; Laurent
> Le
>     > Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>; Matt Garrish
>     > <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
>     > Subject: [admin] merging matt's version?
>     >
>     > At the moment there is PR coming from Matt for the WP editor's draft.
> We
>     > discussed today where to put comments on the document, and the
> proposal
>     > was to comment on the PR. However, so far, I have not seen any
> comments
>     > that would fundamentally disagree with Matt's version; all comments
> aimed
>     > at improvements thereof. I would therefore propose that the WG
> accepts
>     > that PR, let the editors merge the PR, so that we come back to the target,
>     ie,
>     > that we have a document on the wpub repository that we can all
> comment
>     > on and, possibly, produce PR-s. Two level PR-s (ie, PR on a PR), etc,
>     seems to
>     > just complicate things...
>     >
>     > Just an idea.
>     >
>     > Ivan
>     >
>     > ---
>     > Ivan Herman
>     > Tel:+31 641044153
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iv
> an-
> herman.net&data=02%7C01%7C%7C8bdb707a45b64626d19808d4e8c804c8
> %7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6363893931724745
> 01&sdata=S0XqjDMAsFO066JvVcvxWqTlrbCZgqtGwjGtOZW9ffo%3D&reserve
> d=0
>     >
>     > (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)
>     >
>     >
>     >
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 21 August 2017 20:27:57 UTC