Re: [admin] merging matt's version?

Then if we merge the PR, where do the chairs want the comments on the full document?  New issues?  New PRs?

On 8/21/17, 3:08 PM, "Matt Garrish" <matt.garrish@gmail.com> wrote:

    +1
    
    I would like to merge not because I believe in the infallibility of my
    editing skills, but because this PR is more of a general refactoring than a
    significant change to what was there before.
    
    We'll continue to make improvements as we go, but I don't want to turn this
    PR into a debate over specific issues we know not everyone agrees on yet.
    
    Matt
    
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken [mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com]
    > Sent: August 21, 2017 3:00 PM
    > To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>; W3C Publishing Working Group <public-
    > publ-wg@w3.org>
    > Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>; Tim Cole <t-
    > cole3@illinois.edu>; Luc Audrain <laudrain@hachette-livre.fr>; Laurent Le
    > Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>; Matt Garrish
    > <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
    > Subject: RE: [admin] merging matt's version?
    > 
    > +1
    > 
    > Tzviya Siegman
    > Information Standards Lead
    > Wiley
    > 201-748-6884
    > tsiegman@wiley.com
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
    > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 2:51 PM
    > To: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
    > Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>; Tim Cole <t-
    > cole3@illinois.edu>; Luc Audrain <laudrain@hachette-livre.fr>; Laurent Le
    > Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>; Matt Garrish
    > <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
    > Subject: [admin] merging matt's version?
    > 
    > At the moment there is PR coming from Matt for the WP editor's draft. We
    > discussed today where to put comments on the document, and the proposal
    > was to comment on the PR. However, so far, I have not seen any comments
    > that would fundamentally disagree with Matt's version; all comments aimed
    > at improvements thereof. I would therefore propose that the WG accepts
    > that PR, let the editors merge the PR, so that we come back to the target,
    ie,
    > that we have a document on the wpub repository that we can all comment
    > on and, possibly, produce PR-s. Two level PR-s (ie, PR on a PR), etc,
    seems to
    > just complicate things...
    > 
    > Just an idea.
    > 
    > Ivan
    > 
    > ---
    > Ivan Herman
    > Tel:+31 641044153
    > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ivan-herman.net&data=02%7C01%7C%7C8bdb707a45b64626d19808d4e8c804c8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636389393172474501&sdata=S0XqjDMAsFO066JvVcvxWqTlrbCZgqtGwjGtOZW9ffo%3D&reserved=0

    > 
    > (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)
    > 
    > 
    >

Received on Monday, 21 August 2017 19:46:08 UTC