- From: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:19:20 -0400
- To: Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2017 20:19:48 UTC
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Hadrien Gardeur < hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com> wrote: > Hello Dave, > > > You're conflating two different things here: > > - list of primary resources in reading order (spine in EPUB) > - table of contents (which is navigation) > > They can be the same thing for a novel like Moby Dick but they can also be > vastly different, for instance a ToC could: > > - only point to some, not all primary resources > > It's easy enough to change the visual display of certain list items, or an entire nav element. But I think it's a useful default for everything to appear. > > - point to the same resource multiple times (for example using > fragments to specific locations in a resource) > > This is not a problem. We can just say that the "spine" is the unique resources; a TOC can refer to them as many times as needed > > - point to resources in an order that's not the reading order > > I'd be interested to see examples of this; in any case this sounds potentially confusing for the reader. > Saying that a list of primary resources duplicates a ToC (or any other > navigation) is therefore incorrect in the general case. > > There are tradeoffs to be made, of course. I feel this proposal makes the vast majority of potential use cases much simpler. Regards, Dave
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2017 20:19:48 UTC