Re: Updating ProvRDF

Hi,

OK, (2) it is.  

Forwarding to the SW wiki is a good idea.  Any suggestions on what page title/location to create for this on the SW wiki?

Would it make sense to copy the page wholesale over to the SW wiki and replace the old version with a stub and link, to avoid possible confusion?

--James

On May 7, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Tim Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:

> James, 
> 
> I would suggest putting your 2) in place.
> 
> With the group disbanding in less than two weeks, I don't think we'll have the time.
> 
> I think it will be a useful historical document. Thanks for initiating it.
> 
> Please add a forward link to the SW wiki so that the community has a place to develop it if they wish. I know C&P stated that this doc was essential for them. If we steer the community to that editable page, it can avoid the duplicate work and evolve what it needs.
> 
> Tim
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 7, 2013, at 8:24, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> I would be interested, but don't have time.. :(
>> 
>> I would personally just add a fat banner with an "outdated" warning and links to relevant  recommendation sections and let the existing content stay.
>> 
>> On 6 May 2013 16:39, "James Cheney" <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> The ProvRDF page [1] is still out of date.  We had a request back in February to update it.  Now that the documents are finalized, and before the wiki is frozen, it would be nice to do one of the following:
>> 
>> 1. update it to reflect the final version of PROV-O and PROV-N, and link to it from the main wiki page to make it easier to find in the future if it's helpful to others; or
>> 
>> 2. remove or deprecate the wiki page to make it clear that it is an intermediate artifact and doesn't reflect final versions of PROV.  (Of course, people should know this from the fact that it isn't featured in the recommendations, but it would be good to avoid any possibility of confusion.)  Tim, I see you already added a note to this effect and linked to Hector's notes.  So maybe all that is needed is to update the wiki page to say that the mapping not going to be updated.
>> 
>> For (1), Hector Perez-Urbina sent some comments [2,3] that could be used as a starting point - this seems relatively complete (it only appears to omit agent, specialization, alternate, membership).  But I would like to have someone more familiar with PROV-O than I am help to translate these to the form used in the current version of [1].
>> 
>> Concretely, Tim or Stian, would you be interested / do you have time?
>> 
>> I'm happy to do (2) if no one steps up to help with (1).
>> 
>> --James
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF
>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2013Feb/0005.html
>> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2013Feb/att-0005/PROV-NtoPROV-Omappings.pdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> 
>>