- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:24:02 +0200
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAExK0DcSc_rAXxRsJ1eYOzgM7fBzFHyz-9dc6OVoZierWLm4Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, sorry for jumping a bit late in the thread. It seems like the need for activity composition is clear but everybody is agreeing in that we should not create a new relation for modeling it. If that is the case, where should we address the subactivity composition? In a best practice document? I like the dcterms:hasPart idea, but I would like to see it written down as a recommendation or best practice somewhere. Thanks, Daniel 2012/9/10 Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > > > > Hi Stian, > > I think you have drifted in your discussion. > This issue has been addressed in prov-constraints: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Aug/0153.html > and voted before LC release. > > generation-uniqueness is for a pair e,a. > > However all generations for an entity should occur simultaneously. > > > Luc > > > > On 09/06/2012 11:11 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > It still raises the question about entities generated by both > activities and the generation-uniqueness constraint. > > One way around it, as I've approached it for Taverna's workflow PROV, > is to use prov:alternateOf between two entities, one per > generation/invalidation. You can picture these entities as > representing "The value as output gate X" and "The value at output > gate Y" - almost like the old prov:EntityInRole. This is the same > reasoning a washed car coming out of the last-stage > activity(polishing) and thereby completing the activity(carWashing) > can be seen as generated twice, once as "polishedCar" and once as > "washedCar" - even though there is nothing happening between the two > activities and the two entities are equivalent. > > If this is the recommended approach, then it would be good to have a > property to clarify this is not just any odd alternate; say > prov:alternateInSubActivity. (as a property on the prov:Entity or a > subproperty of prov:alternateOf). Otherwise it gets tricky to query > the provenance across, we don't want to follow every odd alternate up > and down the trace. The strange thing here is that you don't **need** to > do the prov:alternateOf wrapping for usage or association. The > question also then comes to which extend to the subactivities should > always twin the entities or not. > > I don't particularly like that "work around" approach for > subactivities, as it ends up making a verbose "twin world" with > alternate identifiers (which you have to mint) - effectively making an > inline bundle without clear boundaries. > > > > The second way, much simpler and my preference, is to allow multiple > generation, but only as long as one activity is subactivity of the > other. I guess we can't infer which one is the sub and which one is > the super - so it would be a constraint rather than an inference, but > this gets tricky with the open world assumption and the use of OR/NOT. > > (This can be solved by adding a prov:alternateActivityFor as a > symmetric superproperty of prov:wasSubActivityOf, then we can instead > of the constraint simply infer prov:alternateActivityFor on multiple > generations. The semantics of prov:alternativeActivityFor would be > particularly weak, similar to prov:alternativeOf. ) > > > This is indeed the approach we have taken for Wf4Ever's 'simplified' > workflow provenance model wfprov -http://wf4ever.github.com/ro/#wfprov > > Here wfprov:wasPartOfWorkflowRun is the workflow equivalent of > wasSubActivityOf, and both are allowed to have the same artifact (ie. > entity) as it's wfprov:wasOutputFrom. Because of this we currently we > can't make wfprov:wasOutputFrom a subproperty of prov:wasGeneratedBy > without violating PROV-Constraints. As we don't want to make a too > verbose model, we are trying to avoid adding the equivalent of > prov:alternateOf workaround I sketched above. > > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 03:24:30 UTC