- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:53:16 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|ec0d413556233544436e9201617149e7o83DrI08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5045F9BC>
Hi all, This issue is now closed. Luc On 27/06/12 10:42, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, Graham, > > Definition was updated in the latest Editor's draft > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-specialization > > I am closing this issue pending review. > > Cheers, > Luc > > On 06/24/2012 10:56 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> Luc, >> >> I'm happy to have the issue closed once the changes make it in. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> On Jun 24, 2012, at 12:46 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: >> >>> I think that's clearer. (I agree the original was a bit confusing.) >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>> >>> Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>> <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jim, Tim, >>> >>> Given that specialization is the name of the relation we are >>> defining, >>> this may be confusing. >>> >>> I would suggest two changes: >>> >>> In the second sentence of the English definition: >>> >>> In particular, the lifetime of the specialized entity contains >>> that of any specialization >>> -> >>> In particular, the lifetime of the entity being specialized >>> contains that of any specialization >>> >>> and in the first bullet point >>> >>> specific entity: an identifier (infra) of the specialized entity >>> -> >>> specific entity: an identifier (infra) of the entity that is a >>> specialization of the general entity (supra) >>> >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> Luc >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 23/06/2012 16:25, Jim McCusker wrote: >>>> Yes, specificEntity should read: >>>> >>>> specificEntity: an identifier (infra) of the specialization. >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue >>>> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> PROV-ISSUE-435: "specialized entity" in specialization >>>> definition [prov-dm] >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/435 >>>> >>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>>> On product: prov-dm >>>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I think I found a hiccup in the definition of >>>> specialization of. >>>> >>>> I've illustrated it here: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/File:SpecializationOf-bundle.png >>>> (and already discussed it with Luc and James). >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jim McCusker >>>> Programmer Analyst >>>> Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics >>>> Yale School of Medicine >>>> james.mccusker@yale.edu <mailto:james.mccusker@yale.edu> | >>>> (203) 785-6330 >>>> http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu >>>> <http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu/> >>>> >>>> PhD Student >>>> Tetherless World Constellation >>>> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute >>>> mccusj@cs.rpi.edu <mailto:mccusj@cs.rpi.edu> >>>> http://tw.rpi.edu <http://tw.rpi.edu/> >>> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 12:53:51 UTC