- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:42:13 +0100
- To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- CC: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|81e07d8a5dd552d44329a121112dc6eao83DgH08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5045F725>
Hi all, This issue is now closed. Luc On 30/05/12 15:58, Satya Sahoo wrote: > Hi Luc, > Thanks for making the change and closing the issue! > > Best, > Satya > > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > <mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > The changes have been implemented. I am now closing this issue > pending review. > > Regards, > Luc > > > On 05/24/2012 03:46 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >> Hi Tim, Paolo, >> >> There was no response about my suggestion, but a similar suggestion >> was made by Paolo, in prov-n document [1]. >> >> So, I have made entity optional in usage (in prov-dm) [2] and >> update the grammar in prov-n [1]. >> >> Paolo, can you update the example in [1]? >> >> Thanks, >> Luc >> >> [1] >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-n.html#expression-Usage >> [2] >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage >> >> On 05/24/2012 01:28 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: >>> Luc, Satya, >>> >>> This issue was reassigned to DM from the "dm-provrdf mapping" >>> product. >>> >>> Where do we stand on this "asymmetry" between an optional >>> activity on Generation but not Usage. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tim >>> >>> On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Satya, >>>> Then, the equivalent would be to make the entity of a usage >>>> optional (i.e. the object of involvement). >>>> We can do it, if people feel it's appropriate. >>>> Luc >>>> >>>> On 06/03/2012 15:43, Satya Sahoo wrote: >>>>> Hi Luc, >>>>> The issue is about having activity id as optional for >>>>> Generation and not for Usage - this is distinct from id of the >>>>> Generation and Usage record id. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Satya >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Luc Moreau >>>>> <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Generation and usage have both optional id: >>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Generation >>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage >>>>> >>>>> Luc >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 05/03/12 13:45, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage >>>>> [mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/288 >>>>> >>>>> Raised by: Satya Sahoo >>>>> On product: mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o >>>>> >>>>> If activity id is optional for generation record, >>>>> why is it not so for usage record? These two points >>>>> need to be reconciled either way. (Satya) >>>>> >>>>> Similar to generation, time can be "folded" into >>>>> the "attribute" list. (Satya) >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Usage >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel:+44 23 8059 4487 <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%204487> >> University of Southampton fax:+44 23 8059 2865 <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%202865> >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> >> United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel:+44 23 8059 4487 <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%204487> > University of Southampton fax:+44 23 8059 2865 <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%202865> > Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm> > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 12:42:58 UTC