Tim & Curt +1. Consumption should state an MUST not be used after it consumption occurred. Paul >> I think you are both hitting the right issue. >> >> There is a difference between saying something shouldn't be used and >> saying it can't be used (i.e. it is impossible for it to have been >> used). >> >> I agree -- we want to handle the later case, not the former. > > Well stated! > I agree, "can't be used" is much more fundamental and appropriate in PROV. > > We should leave "shouldn't be used" for the application domains and extensions. > > -Tim > > >> >> Curt >> >> > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University AmsterdamReceived on Friday, 30 March 2012 14:33:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:13 UTC