Luc, Yes, it addresses my concern. I closed the issue. BTW, I think the following contains a typo (two "formers"): ""An entity is a specialization of another if they both refer to some common thing but the former is a more constrained entity than the former. The common entity does not need to be identified. "" Regards, Tim On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > > I believe the latest version addresses your concern. > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#component4 > > I am proposing to close this issue pending your review on WD5. > Regards, > Luc > > On 02/22/2012 06:34 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-261 (TLebo): alternateOf is not owl:sameAs (rephrase definition) [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/261 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: prov-dm >> >> The following could be reasonably interpreted as owl:sameAs, which prov:alternateOf is _not_: >> >> "The purpose of this section is to introduce relations between two entities that refer to the same thing in the world" >> >> propose to rephrase to: >> >> "The purpose of this section is to introduce relations between two entities that describe a common, more abstract thing in the world." >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > >Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 17:33:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:13 UTC