Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model]

On 03/27/2012 03:47 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 14:54, Luc Moreau<l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>    
>> I have drafted a revised section in a separate file
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd5-prov-dm-alternate.html
>>
>> Does capture what has been discussed so far?
>>      
> I think it reads well.
>
> I would not refer directly to the BBC article about Obama appealing to
> Iran, that's not very neutral, and don't belong in a standard. ;)
>
> Find some flower article or something? ;)
>    

Thanks, updated to
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17526723

>    
>> "Considering again the two versions of the technical report tr:WD-prov-dm-20111215"
>>      
> - this example should be removed?
>    

why? it's a follow on from section 3. Isn't it correct?


Luc
>
>
>
>    
>> Also, if specialization(a,b) is it the case that alternateOf(a,b)?
>>      
> Perhaps sometimes. We should not enforce so, as that would also force
> us to include the turtles in the spec.
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 16:09:30 UTC