- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 10:36:16 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Consumption is intended to be the opposite of Usage, i.e. Destruction / FinalUsage. Once consumed, it cannot be used again. -Tim On Mar 17, 2012, at 5:05 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > Thanks for the example. What is Consumption? Is it a subtype of Usage? > > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science > University of Southampton > Southampton SO17 1BJ > United Kingdom > > On 16 Mar 2012, at 15:56, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > >> prov-wg, >> >> Inspired by the discussions on the "opposite of generation", I put together an RDF example that I think models the two kinds of "destruction/expiration" that fulfill the missing symmetric construct to Generation. >> >> As I hope others will start doing, I added my example to http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Category:PROV_example >> which is organized according to the WG-approved organization described at [1]. >> >> The example's wiki page: >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Eg-18-opposite-of-generated >> >> The example (as it stands today): >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/71a70443b308/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl >> >> The example (as it stands $today): >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl >> >> Does this example help the discussion? >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_examples_-_directory_conventions >
Received on Saturday, 17 March 2012 14:36:48 UTC