- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:21:15 -0600
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Mar 16, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > prov-wg, > > Inspired by the discussions on the "opposite of generation", I put together an RDF example that I think models the two kinds of "destruction/expiration" that fulfill the missing symmetric construct to Generation. > > As I hope others will start doing, I added my example to http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Category:PROV_example > which is organized according to the WG-approved organization described at [1]. > > The example's wiki page: > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Eg-18-opposite-of-generated > > The example (as it stands today): > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/71a70443b308/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl > > The example (as it stands $today): > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl > > Does this example help the discussion? +1 I like the consumption example; it allows us to describe the provenance of what caused the expiration of the entity. I am also happy with this modeling of expiration; it is simple and to the point. --Stephan > > Regards, > Tim > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_examples_-_directory_conventions >
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 17:21:58 UTC