Re: unchewed gum and coupons

On Mar 16, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote:

> prov-wg,
> 
> Inspired by the discussions on the "opposite of generation", I put together an RDF example that I think models the two kinds of "destruction/expiration" that fulfill the missing symmetric construct to Generation.
> 
> As I hope others will start doing, I added my example to http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Category:PROV_example
> which is organized according to the WG-approved organization described at [1].
> 
> The example's wiki page:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Eg-18-opposite-of-generated
> 
> The example (as it stands today):
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/71a70443b308/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl
> 
> The example (as it stands $today):
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl
> 
> Does this example help the discussion?

+1

I like the consumption example; it allows us to describe the provenance of what caused the expiration of the entity.

I am also happy with this modeling of expiration; it is simple and to the point.

--Stephan

> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_examples_-_directory_conventions
>