- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:21:13 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Mar 16, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-328 (jhao): prov:wasStartedBy and prov:wasEndedBy as the core provenance terms [PROV-O HTML] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/328 > > Raised by: Jun Zhao > On product: PROV-O HTML > > This is a sub-property of prov:wasAssociatedWith. > > Should it keep it as one of the core terms or as an additional term. "It is a subproperty or subclass" seems to be a reasonable rule to place it into "additional". This way, "additional" category becomes something more like "specific". > > I vote for it to be as a core. I updated http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o to reflect them in "additional" to see how it looks. Can you take a look? > > The same should be applied to prov:wasEndedBy. > > I think the decision should also be consistent with how we are going to treat all the subclasses of prov:Agent. I agree that these two should be consistently applied. Regards, Tim > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 14:21:51 UTC