- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:00:35 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 11:01:08 UTC
Hi Jun, I don't think this is appropriate: wasInformedBy expresses dependencies within activities (i.e., p2 generated e1 and p1 used p1), while wasStartedByActivity just indicates that p2 started p1. In both cases there is a dependency, but I don't think it's enough to make one subclass of the other. Thanks, Daniel 2012/3/16 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> > PROV-ISSUE-329 (jzhao): prov:wasStartedByActivity sub-property of > prov:wasInformedBy? [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/329 > > Raised by: Jun Zhao > On product: mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o > > Should prov:wasStartedByActivity be sub-property of prov:wasInformedBy? > > > >
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 11:01:08 UTC