Yes that's fine. Paul On Mar 15, 2012, at 1:04, Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote: > Hi Paul. > The latest version of the ontlogy is OWL-RL compliant. Can we close this issue? > > Thanks, > Daniel > > 2012/3/5 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> > PROV-ISSUE-303 (TLebo): PROV-O OWL review (2/6) Paul [Ontology] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/303 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: Ontology > > http://www.w3.org/mid/4F3CF3AA.4080501@vu.nl > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#WG_feedback_Feb_2012 > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.02.23#PROV-O_Ontology:_Reviewer_feedback > > > >Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 06:05:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:10 UTC