Yes that's fine.
Paul
On Mar 15, 2012, at 1:04, Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:
> Hi Paul.
> The latest version of the ontlogy is OWL-RL compliant. Can we close this issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> 2012/3/5 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> PROV-ISSUE-303 (TLebo): PROV-O OWL review (2/6) Paul [Ontology]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/303
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Ontology
>
> http://www.w3.org/mid/4F3CF3AA.4080501@vu.nl
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#WG_feedback_Feb_2012
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.02.23#PROV-O_Ontology:_Reviewer_feedback
>
>
>
>