Re: PROV-ISSUE-279 (TLebo): Model subclasses of Derivation [Ontology]

Yes. Now that Derivation is much simpler, it is not a concern worth an issue.

I closed it.

-Tim

On Mar 14, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> after the agreement reached in the last telecon to simplify the definition of derivation,
> can we close this issue?
> 
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 2012/3/4 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> PROV-ISSUE-279 (TLebo): Model subclasses of Derivation [Ontology]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/279
> 
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Ontology
> 
> http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPRnXt=HroR82G186UdbCEqK+Vyg9SoVR7c8nFJbLPeKaQOQCw@mail.gmail.com>
> 
> precise vs. inprecise in
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Derivation
> -- we have implemented Daniel's suggest in the OWL  (I did not add the
> mysterious prov:steps - but perhaps Tim can add this, he seems to know
> how. I was hoping we could do this as a subclass of prov:Derivation)
> 
> 
> 
>