W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: [provo-html] Re: PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:06:23 -1100
Message-ID: <4F5EFFFF.1090602@vu.nl>
To: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hi Khalid,

I would prefer to leave this issue open as a check when the next version 
of the ontology comes out. This is not just about owl-rl but how the 
whole thing looks in things like sparql.

I'm sure it will be resolved but I want it as a reminder to check.


Khalid Belhajjame wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Given that we decided to adopt OWL-RL, which is a (subset) profile of
> OWL. Would you be happy if we close this issue?
> Thanks, khalid
> On 06/10/2011 10:11, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/119
>> Raised by: Paul Groth
>> On product: Formal Model
>> The Provenance Ontology uses OWL for a number of reasons. However, we agreed at the last F2F that it was a good idea for adoption that that OWL be easy to use in "vanilla RDF" or developer friendly RDF.
>> I was wondering if we could either add a section or another document that shows how some examples look in such vanilla rdf. Essentially, what can I do if I don't know anything about reasoning or even class hierarchies.

Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 20:07:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:10 UTC