- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:59:12 +0000
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hi Paul, Given that we decided to adopt OWL-RL, which is a (subset) profile of OWL. Would you be happy if we close this issue? Thanks, khalid On 06/10/2011 10:11, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/119 > > Raised by: Paul Groth > On product: Formal Model > > The Provenance Ontology uses OWL for a number of reasons. However, we agreed at the last F2F that it was a good idea for adoption that that OWL be easy to use in "vanilla RDF" or developer friendly RDF. > > I was wondering if we could either add a section or another document that shows how some examples look in such vanilla rdf. Essentially, what can I do if I don't know anything about reasoning or even class hierarchies. > > > >
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 18:00:03 UTC