- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:09:44 +0000
- To: "Myers, Jim" <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jim, Maybe the example didn't make it clear enough. The first entity was the one at http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/ entity(tr:prov-dm,[prov:type="working draft", ex:version="1"]) which is no longer version 1, when v2 comes out at the same url. Luc On 03/09/2012 07:24 PM, Myers, Jim wrote: > I'm not so sure I like the examples though - version 1 doesn't become invalid/endOfLife when v2 comes out - v1 is still a valid entity that could have provenance (v1 is used to create v1.1 after v2 comes out...). Similarly, the entity representing the papers doesn't become something that has no provenance when it becomes unavailable - in fact I'd probably like to document what happened to it between when it went offline and when it reappeared. I think there are real entity ends that should be describable in the model, but these examples don't seem like good/valid uses to me. > > >> > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 10:10:42 UTC