- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:24:37 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Mar 8, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > > > > Section 2.3: > > "AccountEntity" - why not just "Account". Also, I understood this was to *be* a bundle, not a container for a bundle. +1, +1 > > The example given has no clear relationship to the description. I understood the key use-case here was to express provenance of procenance, and that is why we have accounts. I think that should be stated clearly; e.g. > > "An account is a bundle of provenance statements treated as an entity which may itself have some associated provenance." +1 -Tim
Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 02:25:09 UTC