Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3

On Mar 8, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> Section 2.3:
> 
> "AccountEntity" - why not just "Account".  Also, I understood this was to *be* a bundle, not a container for a bundle.

+1, +1

> 
> The example given has no clear relationship to the description.  I understood the key use-case here was to express provenance of procenance, and that is why we have accounts.  I think that should be stated clearly; e.g.
> 
> "An account is a bundle of provenance statements treated as an entity which may itself have some associated provenance."

+1

-Tim