- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:02:41 -0500
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 20:03:16 UTC
In direct conflict with ISSUE-262, so I'm closing this one (and fixing 262 as we speak). -Tim On Mar 6, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > Hi Tim, > the current version of the ontology includes this. > Can we close this issue? > > Thanks, > Daniel > > 2012/2/20 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> > PROV-ISSUE-255 (TLebo): rename ALL hadQualifiedXXX to simply prov:qualified > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/255 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: > > To simplify the model without losing expressivity... > > The distinction of pointing to, e.g., a Generation or a Usage would be known by the rdf:type of the object referenced by prov:qualified. > > prov:qualified's range would be prov:Involvement. > > This is based on the email discussions of the weekend. > > This request does not claim to provide a full argument, but is captured here as an ISSUE. > > -Tim > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 20:03:16 UTC