Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]

Hi Luc,
The issue is about having activity id as optional for Generation and not
for Usage - this is distinct from id of the Generation and Usage record id.

Thanks.

Best,
Satya

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Generation and usage have both optional id:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/**raw-file/default/model/prov-**
> dm.html#term-Generation<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Generation>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/**raw-file/default/model/prov-**
> dm.html#term-Usage<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage>
>
> Luc
>
>
> On 05/03/12 13:45, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>> PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm<->
>>  prov-o]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**track/issues/288<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/288>
>>
>> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
>> On product: mapping prov-dm<->  prov-o
>>
>>     If activity id is optional for generation record, why is it not so
>> for usage record? These two points need to be reconciled either way. (Satya)
>>
>>     Similar to generation, time can be "folded" into the "attribute"
>> list. (Satya)
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**wiki/ProvRDF#Usage<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Usage>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>