- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:27:35 -0500
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:39:16 UTC
I just closed the issue, thanks. Tim On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > Hi Tim, > I think this issue has already been addressed: wasDerivedFrom is a subproperty of tracedTo. > Can it be closed? > Thanks, > Daniel > > 2011/10/20 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > I was just wondering if this decision needs to be made now? > > Can we not just get all the data model concepts reflected in the ontology? > > We can then add more sophisticated constraints later. For example, the data model as I read it does not have any hierarchy of derivation properties. > > cheers, > Paul > > Satya Sahoo wrote: > Hi all, > Comments are interleaved. > > However - dependedOn is transitive - but wasDerivedFrom is > not. Can > you be a subproperty and loose the transitivity? > > > (Did anyone else answer this?) > > Yes, I think so. > > I agree. > > The current ProvenanceOntology.owl models wasDerivedFrom as subPropertyOf dependedOn (also discussed in Issue-125). In addition, wasEventuallyDerivedFrom is modeled as a subPropertyOf wasDerivedFrom. > > Thanks. > > Best, > Satya > >
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:39:16 UTC