W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: New prov-o ontology!

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:37:17 -0500
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1688213A-3FF8-4B96-A218-D5C90DE7F2A4@rpi.edu>
To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>

On Feb 24, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> Hi all,
> this morning I've just updated the ontology and I see that it has changed a lot.
> 	 We have a Roled class. I don't remember having discussed this change.
> 	 Instantaneous event: I'm ok with that, since we discussed it on moday.
> 	 Activity is under "Durable". Why??
> 	 qualified has dissapeared, and we have "involved" range Element AND Involvement? (I think this is a typo, it should be the union).

I added qualified back in, I mistook qualified for the old qualifiable, which wasn't around long.


> 	 I'm still unhappy with the TemporalEntity name. What about just "Time", or "Temporal"?
> Now there are many classes with multiple parent classes, and there will be some unions. Will this be RL compliant?

The rest of your concerns were in response to Paolo's feedback, ISSUE-302 and we will handle it as part of that.


> I haven't gone through all the mail discussions, since there were like 30 new this morning. But PLEASE, could we 
> have a wiki page or another ontology where we gather the feedback and discuss it within the prov-o team before
> implementing to the ontology? Tha last one we had may have had some issues, but it was much more simple
> and easy to read...
> Thanks,
> Daniel
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 15:50:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:10 UTC