- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:14:23 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tim,
Can you handle two usages at different times for a same entity? I fear that a property usedAt does not allow for this.
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom
On 4 Mar 2012, at 02:09, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> Sorry, the page cut me short:
>
> Time can be incrementally qualified, just like the binary relations.
>
> The following pattern could be used for started, ended, used, and wasGeneratedAt:
>
>
> :input_1 prov:usedAt "2012-03-03T21:04:54-05:00" .
> :input_2 prov:usedAt "2012-04-04T21:04:54-05:00" .
>
> :dataSet
> prov:used :input_1, :input_2;
> prov:qualified [
> a prov:Usage;
> prov:entity :input_1;
> prov:atTime "2012-03-03T21:04:54-05:00";
> ], [
> a prov:Usage;
> prov:entity :input_2;
> prov:atTime "2012-04-04T21:04:54-05:00"
> ];
> .
>
>
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/mid/E1RtEkN-0003xz-Ik@tibor.w3.org
>
> http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKc1nHfd8B1a9m=eKCACQJpNZgGR1GJdaiDpNpnTxqycb4LDUA@mail.gmail.com
>
>
>
>
> -Tim
>
> On Mar 3, 2012, at 9:05 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>> PROV-ISSUE-280 (TLebo): {started,ended,used,wasGenerated}At <-> prov:qualified [ prov:atTime ] pattern [Ontology]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/280
>>
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: Ontology
>>
>> Time can be incrementally qualified, just like the binary relations.
>>
>>
>> :dataSet
>> prov:used :input_1, :input_2;
>> prov:usedAt "2012-03-03T21:04:54-05:00", "2012-04-04T21:04:54-05:00";
>> prov:qualified [
>> a prov:Usage;
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/mid/E1RtEkN-0003xz-Ik@tibor.w3.org
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKc1nHfd8B1a9m=eKCACQJpNZgGR1GJdaiDpNpnTxqycb4LDUA@mail.gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2012 10:16:13 UTC