W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Collecting PROV examples

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:18:25 -0500
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <C593B12E-0BBE-4353-9AED-73DC431F217F@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

Did I handle your concern in the most recent revision?

I think it's addressed at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_examples#Transcriptions

The choice between nesting the formats or having them as siblings is up to the author of the example.

You could do it as:



The latter situation is preferable in mechanical transformations.
When using the former, eg-1.ttl and eg-1.asn should have the same content (in the frbr:Work sense).


On Feb 28, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> What is it exactly what you mean by format change.
> I believe I could write an example, say in both asn and rdf, both written by hand.
> I can then generate xml automatically with a tool.
> I thought in the nested directory we would find the xml files, and in the root directory both asn and rdf.
> Isn't it the intent?
> Luc
> On 28/02/2012 16:59, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> Thanks, Luc.
>> I'm okay with removing the initial "format" layer. Can we keep the convert/ nesting to indicate format changes?
>> -Tim

Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 02:18:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:09 UTC