- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:34:35 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
After some updating, neither http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o nor https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html contain the string "hadOriginalSource" I have marked this issue as PENDING-REVIEW. Procedural question (that should become reflected in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Tracking_Public_Comments ) Should this now be raised at our weekly meeting, for WG approval to respond to the commenter? Thanks, -Tim On Aug 9, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-476: (Editorial comment) hadOriginalSource still occurs in LC documents [PROV-O HTML] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/476 > > Raised by: Tom De Nies > On product: PROV-O HTML > > This is to address the comment by Jacek Kopecky found here: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Aug/0000.html > > Apparently, hadOriginalSource still occurs a few times in some of the documents (from what I gather by a quick search, only in PROV-O), and should be changed to primary source. > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 17:34:46 UTC