- From: Olaf Hartig <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:04:48 +0200
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hey Graham, On Wednesday 18 May 2011 11:01:17 Graham Klyne wrote: > [...] > My current sense is that RDF community consensus favours named graphs: > (1) the SPARQL syntax makes explicit provision for querying named graphs, > (2) the current RDF working group is giving consideration to including a > mechanism to encode named graphs within a single RDF documemt > (3) even when using RDF without named graph support, named graphs map > directly to a natural web-based implementation: RDF documents retrievable > from web URIs. > [...] I never understood this argument completely so far. How exactly does this mapping you refer to work? Greetings, Olaf
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 16:49:27 UTC