- From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:33:04 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Paul and others, I meant to respond earlier to expand on what I meant by "examples" in the telecon on Thursday (and because I will unfortunately miss this Thursday's). I think the example and concept illustrations are a good starting point. I agree that it's good to employ high-level examples and document how the examples illustrate the concepts, but I think it would really help me (and perhaps others) to have concrete examples of how the different current proposals would handle examples like the data journalism one, so that any disagreement can be discussed in concrete terms. For example, the original "data journalism example" included an OPM- like graph and discussion that made it fairly clear how the example would be handled in an OPM style. During the telecon, I think Paulo was arguing that other languages such as PML would interpret various terms differently, leading to a different interpretation of the concepts. I think the current example/illustration also has this flavor, so I would like to see what would change if a PML or other style were used instead. I don't pretend to be an expert on any of the provenance languages/ vocabularies being considered so far (my work has been mostly on provenance in databases, where there is a lot more variability between different techniques). Are there people who are experts on other techniques (PML, Provenir, Provenance Vocabulary) who could add examples of how they'd handle the data journalism example to the wiki? I don't mid trying to do so myself, but as a non-expert on the other techniques it is not clear that what I would come up with would be useful. --James On May 10, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi All: > > I asked for feedback on the proposed data journalism example [1] by > Monday. There was not a lot of discussion so I hope it's safe to > assume that the example was considered to be a good start. > > To help the discussion get going, I've put up a page [2] that lists > each concept from the charter and illustration of it from the example. > > It would be good to see if we agree whether these illustrations > actually illustrate the concepts. > > regards, > Paul > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvenanceExample > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/CharterConceptsIllustration > > -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 10:33:34 UTC