- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:21:37 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|222d0a89a07d182e31d8c62a138682aan5S8Lj08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E0AD281>
Hi Satya, I would not replace, but add it to the definition: Derivation represents how stuff is transformed from, created from, or affected by other stuff. A thing B is derived from a thing A if the values of some invariant properties of B are at least partially determined by the values of some invariant properties of A. Luc On 06/29/2011 02:16 AM, Satya Sahoo wrote: > > Hi all, > > I broadly agree with Luc and Simon's definition, except I would > replace /affected/ with /created from/, since a thing X may be > affected by thing Y, but X may not be derived from Y. For example, > cold temperature affects plant X, but plant X is not derived from cold > temperature. > > Modified definition: "Derivation represents how stuff is transformed > from or created from other stuff." > > Also, would like to point to the both the "derived from" and > "transformation of" properties defined by the OBO Foundry Relation > ontology [1], which is widely used in biomedical ontologies. > > Thanks. > > Best, > Satya > > [1] http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/ > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org > <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> wrote: > > I prefer Simon's formulation. A concern I had with the previous > form was its dependence on a temporal element. That temporal > dependence may be a consequence, but I don't think it should be > part of the definition. > > #g > -- > > > > Simon Miles wrote: > > Paul, Luc, > > I'm OK with the definition, but I think it could be simplified and > clarified a little, and suggest: > > Derivation represents how stuff is transformed from or affected by > other stuff. A thing B is derived from a thing A if the values > of some > invariant properties of B are at least partially determined by the > values of some invariant properties of A. > > The reasons for this proposed revision: > > 1. "A was used (and therefore created) before B was created" > means the > definition of "derivation" is based on those for "use" and > "generation". This property seems, in practice, necessitated by B > having been determined by A anyway. > > 2. The first sentence mixes plural with singular, so it is > unclear how > many things a derivation relates. > > 3. The "in the real world" caveat seems unnecessary if > "things" are > defined to be explicitly about the real world. Moreover, if we > decide > to revise the definition of "thing" to cover more than the > real world, > then derivation would also have to be revised. > > Thanks, > Simon > > On 20 June 2011 21:07, Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com > <mailto:pgroth@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > What do people think of Luc's definition of derivation: > > - http://www.w3.org/2011/prov > /wiki/ConceptDerivation#Definition_by_Luc_.28in_terms_of_properties.29 > Things represent stuff in the real-world. > > Definition of Derivation. A derivation represents how > stuffs are > transformed or affect each other in the real world. > > A thing B is derived from a thing A if: > > A was used (and therefore created) before B was created > The values of some invariant properties of B are partially > determined by > the values of some invariant properties of A > > James you seemed to suggest another way to define > derivation or not > define it all? Can you be more specific? > > > Thanks, > Paul > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email > Security System. > For more information please visit > http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 07:22:13 UTC