- From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:31:49 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 for the definitions of thing and invariant view Thanks, Simon On 21 June 2011 11:40, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Good suggestion, Stian, thanks! > Luc > > On 06/21/2011 11:07 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 17:06, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> Following comments, I have tried to simplify the definitions of 'thing' and >>> 'IVP of' further. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptInvariantViewOnThing#Further_simplification >>> >> +1 with the qualification of correspondence, for instance: >> >> The asserter is free to choose what "corresponding properties" above >> means. The corresponding properties might match many-to-many, eg. >> rectangle A may have varying length and width, whereas B, an IVP of A, >> may have a invariant area. >> >> >> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- Dr Simon Miles Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 12:32:17 UTC