Re: Definitions and provenance and invariance

Hi all,

Following comments, I have tried to simplify the definitions of 'thing' 
and 'IVP of'  further.

What do you think? If we are happy with this simplification, we should 
try to
get a coherent set of definitions for Generation/Use/Derivation.

Best regards,

On 06/20/2011 02:42 PM, Graham Klyne wrote:
> Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>> From this I'm not sure if "dynamic resource" is useful as a
>> classification, I would go for Luc's view (and our accepted
>> definition) that invariance is just a relation [...]
> This would appear to be a consensus!
> #g

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:
United Kingdom           

Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 16:07:08 UTC