- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:06:37 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi all, Following comments, I have tried to simplify the definitions of 'thing' and 'IVP of' further. http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptInvariantViewOnThing#Further_simplification What do you think? If we are happy with this simplification, we should try to get a coherent set of definitions for Generation/Use/Derivation. Best regards, Luc On 06/20/2011 02:42 PM, Graham Klyne wrote: > Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >>> From this I'm not sure if "dynamic resource" is useful as a >> classification, I would go for Luc's view (and our accepted >> definition) that invariance is just a relation [...] > > This would appear to be a consensus! > > #g > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 16:07:08 UTC