- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:42:05 +0100
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >>From this I'm not sure if "dynamic resource" is useful as a > classification, I would go for Luc's view (and our accepted > definition) that invariance is just a relation [...] This would appear to be a consensus! #g
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 13:44:52 UTC