- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:17:00 +0100
- To: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:11, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > If we can quickly pull together the simplest possible set of specification > drafts that we can possibly imagine as addressing at least some of our > goals, we can publish them and solicit feedback. That way, we stand a > chance of learning what we're missing that other people really want. By > keeping the drafts really simple, we minimize the risk of describing > something that no user really wants (and in the same stroke, we maximize the > chance of their being read and actually getting feedback). Then iterate. I agree on this style of approach - we should just start by drafting the drafts (!) - this should give a better skeleton to discuss larger issues rather than the current term-by-term discussion. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 13:17:48 UTC