Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

+1
On Jun 9, 2011 10:29 PM, "Paul Groth" <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following
> proposal:
>
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
>
> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all
> process executions to specify a duration.
>
> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
>
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.
> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
>
> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
> this proposal?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>