- From: <creed@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:03:12 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Paul Groth" <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 > > +1 > > khalid > > On 09/06/2011 21:27, Paul Groth wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following >> proposal: >> >> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval" >> >> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all >> process executions to specify a duration. >> >> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows: >> >> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval. >> Statements denoting this duration are optional." >> >> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for >> this proposal? >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> > > >
Received on Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:03:45 UTC