Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

• From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
• Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:14:58 +0100
• To: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
• CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4DF1E092.2010904@cs.man.ac.uk>

+1

khalid

On 09/06/2011 21:27, Paul Groth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following 
> proposal:
>
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
>
> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all 
> process executions to specify a duration.
>
> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
>
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval. 
> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
>
> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
> this proposal?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>

Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 09:15:27 UTC