- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:03:37 +0100
- To: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I agree with Simon on this. #g -- Simon Miles wrote: > I don't strongly mind "snapshot", but doesn't it sort of imply > something at an instant of time (as taken with camera)? We may have an > invariant view on a thing as it exists over a very long time, so > implying we refer to an instant might be confusing. > > Though I don't have a better suggestion off the top of my head, but > will think more. > > Thanks, > Simon > > On 7 June 2011 17:06, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: >> On 07/06/11 08:28, Olaf Hartig wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> I like "snapshot" as well. >> +1 >> >> Jun >> >>> Olaf >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday 07 June 2011 09:18:42 Paul Groth wrote: >>>> Personally, I like the term "snapshot". >>>> >>>> It has a nice common sense interpretation and also has a nice link to >>>> database. >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> This is a useful concept that we are going to reuse in our model for >>>>> provenance. >>>>> Hence, I created an issue for it. >>>>> >>>>> It would be useful to adopt a term for it. >>>>> Please send suggestions. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Luc >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. >> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 11:12:42 UTC