- From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:52:06 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I don't strongly mind "snapshot", but doesn't it sort of imply something at an instant of time (as taken with camera)? We may have an invariant view on a thing as it exists over a very long time, so implying we refer to an instant might be confusing. Though I don't have a better suggestion off the top of my head, but will think more. Thanks, Simon On 7 June 2011 17:06, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > On 07/06/11 08:28, Olaf Hartig wrote: >> Hey, >> >> I like "snapshot" as well. > > +1 > > Jun > >> >> Olaf >> >> >> On Tuesday 07 June 2011 09:18:42 Paul Groth wrote: >>> Personally, I like the term "snapshot". >>> >>> It has a nice common sense interpretation and also has a nice link to >>> database. >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> This is a useful concept that we are going to reuse in our model for >>>> provenance. >>>> Hence, I created an issue for it. >>>> >>>> It would be useful to adopt a term for it. >>>> Please send suggestions. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Luc >> > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- Dr Simon Miles Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 20:52:34 UTC