- From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:35:51 +0100
- To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Satya, Would you also expect agents to have states, aka resources? I would prefer to keep agent simple. That's why I suggest to treat agents as resources, if you want to talk about provenance of that sort of things. In this way, we can reuse of a lot of structure associated with resources. This is just one way of modelling. Of course, if we do agree to have states for agents, we will need a different way to represent it in the model. I am open to discussions. -- Jun On 07/06/11 17:17, Satya Sahoo wrote: > Hi Daniel and Jun, > > After reading your definitions I was wondering if an "agent" or a > "controller" could > also have provenance. > > Agents can also have provenance - in sensor networks the provenance of > the sensor itself will describe its manufacturer, date of manufacture etc. > > > if the newspaper or a service is an agent, then it would be helpful > to know who created it, when, what tools were used for doing so,etc. > > If newspaper is treated as an agent in the sense of a corporate entity, > e.g. NYT - we can describe its actions - NYT sued NYC, NYT publishes > four dailies etc. and its provenance - NYT was founded/created by Henry > Raymond in 1851 etc. > > If you meant newspaper as an edition/publication of NYT (today's > edition), then it would be a "resource". I am not sure what you meant by > service? > > Thanks. > > Best, > Satya > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk > <mailto:jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > I would expect to have descriptions about agents. > > When providing provenance descriptions about newspaper or services, > it might be more appropriate to treat them as "resources". > > -- Jun > > > > On 07/06/11 16:19, Daniel Garijo wrote: > > Hi Satya, Khalid, all > After reading your definitions I was wondering if an "agent" or a > "controller" could > also have provenance. For example, if the newspaper or a service > is an > agent, then it would be > helpful to know who created it, when, what tools were used for > doing so, > etc. > > If they could have provenance, then they would also become some > sort of > "resources" > too, wouldn't they? > > What do you think? > > Best, > Daniel > > 2011/6/6 Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk > <mailto:Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> > <mailto:Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk > <mailto:Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>>> > > > > Hi, > > I added a definition of the concept "agent". > > Definition: An agent is a (physical or digital) entity that > controls > one or multiple process executions > > - The newspaper, the blogger and the government portal are > examples > of agents > > I would prefer to use the term “controller” instead of > “agent”. To > me, the term “agent” is a bit vague. > > Thanks, khalid > > > On 20/05/2011 08:04, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker > wrote: > > PROV-ISSUE-4 (define-agent): Definition for Concept 'Agent' > [Provenance Terminology] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/4 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: Provenance Terminology > > The Provenance WG charter identifies the concept 'Agent' > as a > core concept of the provenance interchange language to be > standardized (see > http://www.w3.org/2011/01/prov-wg-charter). > > What term do we adopt for the concept 'Agent'? > How do we define the concept 'Agent'? > Where does concept 'Agent' appear in ProvenanceExample? > Which provenance query requires the concept 'Agent'? > > Wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptAgent > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 16:36:22 UTC