Re: PROV-ISSUE-19: is this observable or not observable? from Paul Groth on 2011-06-07 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from June 2011)

From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:11:33 +0200
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <BANLkTikZ-cmcBqHDW4Rj4O6FC323Wewz+Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi All,

Can someone attempt to provide a clean notion of what observable and
non-observable mean in this context.

Thanks,
Paul

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> When we discussed the notion of 'Invariant View or Perspective on a Thing,
> there were
> suggestions that it should be observable, and counter-suggestions that it
> should not be.
>
> It would be good to discuss both sides of the argument, in an attempt to
> reach consensus.
>
> Best regards,
> Luc
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 07:12:01 UTC