- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:23:02 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
that's not controversial, is it? with the caveat that generation is qualified with the point during execution when the relation between a process execution and a resource becomes true (not necessarily the end of the execution). -Paolo On 5/31/11 2:05 PM, Graham Klyne wrote: > I agree. > > #g > -- > > > Jun Zhao wrote: >> I propose Generation should be a relationship rather than a concept. >> >> See http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptGeneration#Definition_by_Jun >> >> cheers, >> >> Jun >> >> On 20/05/2011 08:07, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-8 (define-generation): Definition for Concept 'Generation' >>> [Provenance Terminology] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/8 >>> >>> Raised by: Luc Moreau >>> On product: Provenance Terminology >>> >>> The Provenance WG charter identifies the concept 'Generation' as a >>> core concept of the provenance interchange language to be standardized >>> (see http://www.w3.org/2011/01/prov-wg-charter). >>> >>> What term do we adopt for the concept 'Generation'? >>> How do we define the concept 'Generation'? >>> Where does concept 'Generation' appear in ProvenanceExample? >>> Which provenance query requires the concept 'Generation'? >>> >>> Wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptGeneration >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > -- ----------- ~oo~ -------------- Paolo Missier- pmissier@acm.org, Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, UK http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 19:38:47 UTC