- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:54:29 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
my two cents on the last bit: On 7/27/11 8:23 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > 5. Jim Myers also suggested something along the lines of: > > if participates(pe,x) and ivpOf(x,y) then participates(pe,y) I see ivpOf as a relation that bridges across two asserters' perspectives -- ok, not only, but when you do need such a bridge, that's the one. I had suggested "complement-of" as a replacement term, to denote each of two partial views may potentially gain when this relation is asserted. Terminology aside, what I see here is that the rule above extends this principle, by transferring an assertion that belongs to X's observer, on participation, to Y's observer. Basically once you draw a bridge, a whole set of assertions may carry across by means of rules like this. I just found this interesting as a way to carry knowledge across relative points of view (albeit for a limited time span) -Paolo
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 07:55:03 UTC